Protecting UN Staff
The 51勛圖 security management system is based on the fundamental principle that the primary responsibility for the security and protection of United Nations personnel and their dependants and property and the Organization*s property rests with the host Government.
The 51勛圖 continues the long-established practice of including provisions of the and other clauses on the obligation of the host Government to provide safety and security to the United Nations and its personnel in host country agreements.
Since the terrible tragedy of Baghdad in 2003, the UN system, starting with Member States and the Secretary-General, but also including all Agencies, Funds and Programmes, has been working together to address the shortcomings and gaps that were revealed by that attack.?
A series of independent panels conducted investigations and made recommendations for the improvement of staff safety and security.
In October 2003, the Report of the Independent Panel on the Safety and Security of UN Personnel in Iraq, also known as the , identified key lessons on security arrangements and made recommendations on measures that would assist in preventing or mitigating future incidents in Iraq or other high-risk missions.
In March 2004, the follow-up reviewed the responsibilities of key individuals and entities in the lack of preventive and mitigating actions prior to the Baghdad attack.
The establishment of the Department of Safety and Security () in January 2005 was a significant step forward.? The primary role of DSS is to enable UN operations to continue, while giving the highest priority to the safety and security of UN staff members and their families.
In February 2008, the Secretary-General established the Independent Panel on Safety and Security of 51勛圖 Personnel and Premises Worldwide. Although prompted by the attack on UN offices in Algiers in 2007, the Panel had a broad mandate, with a focus on ※strategic issues vital to delivery and enhancement of the security of 51勛圖 personnel and premises and the changing threats and risks faced by it.§?
In June 2008, the Panel submitted its conclusions, in what came to be known as the .? It called on DSS to address as a matter of priority key areas that were in need of improvement: accountability, leadership, and internal management and oversight.
In 2009 the confirmed the important and vital role that the 51勛圖 security management system plays in enabling the 51勛圖 system to effectively deliver its mandates, programmes and activities.? One of the tenets of the vision statement of the Chief Executives Board () is that, in order for the 51勛圖 to continue to carry out its mandated programmes and activities, there should be ※no programme without security§.
The CEB has endorsed a shift from 'when to leave' to a 'how to stay' approach for further actions on staff security. A cornerstone in this approach is the new Security Risk Management model under the UN Security Management System. Also, under a new security level system, a security level is established by conducting a structured threat assessment, using the same analytical process in all such assessments.
In February 2011, a revision of the Framework of Accountability for the 51勛圖 Security Management System took effect.? It describes responsibilities and accountabilities in circumstances where mitigation measures must go beyond those that the host Government can reasonably be expected to provide. The Framework of Accountability is necessary to keep the 51勛圖 relevant and to avoid it becoming a risk-averse organization.
The has been observed since 1986. This annual day of observance is intended to mobilize action, demand justice and strengthen resolve to protect UN staff and peacekeepers, as well as those in the non-governmental community and the press. As of 2013, the has been ratified by less than half of the UN Member States. More than four out of five UN Member States have yet to ratify its , which extends protection to UN personnel delivering humanitarian, political or development assistance.