2023-UNAT-1324

2023-UNAT-1324, Naima Abdellaoui

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT held that the contested Memorandum was not an administrative decision as the Appellant failed to identify how it was affecting her terms or conditions of appointment. UNAT held that the contested Memorandum concerned a general delegation of authority and, therefore, was a decision of general application.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Appellant, a staff member of UNOG, contested a Memorandum of 26 March 2020 from the Under-Secretary-General for Management Strategy, Policy and Compliance establishing an additional delegation of authority in the administration of the Staff Regulations and Rules pursuant to ST/SGB/2019/2 (Delegation of authority in the administration of the Staff Regulations and Rules and the Financial Regulations and Rules). This Memorandum delegated to the Head of Entities the authority to terminate the appointment of a staff member if the necessities of service required reduction of the staff and to decide to offer and approve agreed separation packages. In its Judgment No. UNDT/2021/141, the UNDT dismissed the Appellant’s application as not receivable ratione materiae due to the fact that the contested decision was not an appealable administrative decision.

Legal Principle(s)

The key element of an appealable administrative decision is that it must produce direct legal consequences affecting the staff member’s terms or conditions of appointment. The administrative decision is distinguished from other administrative acts, such as those having regulatory power (which are usually referred to as rules or regulations), as well as from those not having direct legal consequences.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Naima Abdellaoui

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :