UNDT/2016/036, Gallo
Not receivable ratione materia. The contested decision in the present case is not a final decision but a preliminary step after the fact-finding panel has completed its investigation report. Therefore, the contested decision is not an administrative decision capable of being appealed before the Tribunal.
The Applicant, a former Investigator at the P-4 level in the Investigations Division in OIOS, contests the decision taken by the then USG/OIOS to refer the investigation report of a fact- finding panel formed under to the then ASG/OHRM.
N/AAs established by the 51³Ô¹Ï Appeals Tribunal, the Dispute Tribunal is competent to review ex officio its own competence or jurisdiction ratione personae, ratione materiae, and ratione temporis (Pellet 2010-UNAT-073; O’Neill 2011-UNAT-182; Gehr 2013-UNAT-313; Christensen 2013-UNAT-335). This competence can be exercised even if the parties do not raise the issue, because it constitutes a matter of law and the Statute prevents the Dispute Tribunal from considering cases that are not receivable.