UNDT/2024/002

UNDT/2024/002, Abreu

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal noted that under staff rule 11.2(a), requesting a management evaluation was indeed required, but the Applicant had not previously submitted the contested administrative decision for management evaluation. Accordingly, the Tribunal found that the application was not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to grant him a continuing appointment.

Legal Principle(s)

Pursuant to art. 8.1(c) of the Statute of the Dispute Tribunal, “[a]n application shall be receivable if… [a]n applicant has previously submitted the contested administrative decision for management evaluation, where required”.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Abreu

Entity

MINUSTAH

Case Number(s)

UNDT/NY/2024/005

Tribunal

UNDT

Registry

New York