51Թ

UNDT/2018/011

UNDT/2018/011, Gnassou

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Since a PIP was not put in place prior to the expiry of the Applicant’s fixed-term appointment, she could not rely on section 10.5 of ST/AI/2010/5 for the renewal of her contract. The Administration extended the Applicant’s contract several times despite her refusal to accept the offers of contract extension. These extensions were deemed contrary to a strict application of the requirements of section 4.4 of ST/AI 2013/1 and inconsistent with administrative regularity. However, MONUSCO continued to extend the Applicant’s contract in the hope of persuading her to cooperate with the PIP. It was wholly within the Applicant’s control whether she should cooperate by signing acceptance of the extensions granted and submit to the PIP albeit under protest but she chose to stick to her position that there were no grounds upon which her performance could have been assessed as “does not meet performance expectations” and that she should have a 12-month extension and the grant of a continuing appointment. In the circumstances, MONUSCO acted procedurally correctly in finally relying on section 4.4 of ST/AI/2013/1 to not renew the Applicant’s appointment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision by MONUSCO to separate her from service prior to the completion of the rebuttal process for her 2014-2015 performance appraisal.

Legal Principle(s)

When a performance shortcoming is identified during the performance cycle, the first and second reporting officers should proactively assist the staff member to remedy the shortcoming(s). Remedial measures may include counselling, transfer to more suitable functions, additional training and/or the institution of a time-bound performance improvement plan (section 10.1 of ST/AI/2010/5). The contract should be extended for the duration necessary for completion of the performance improvement plan (PIP) (section 10.5 of ST/AI/2010/5). The Organization initiates a renewal of appointment by issuing a letter of renewal indicating the new expiration date and change of department, office of duty station, if any. The staff member shall be requested to sign the letter of renewal accepting the new expiration date and conditions of appointment. Failure to sign and return the letter of renewal within 14 days of receipt shall nullify any proposed renewal of appointment and the staff member’s fixed-term appointment shall expire on the expiration date specified in the currently valid letter of appointment (Section 4.4 of ST/AI/2013/1).

Outcome
Dismissed on merits
Outcome Extra Text

The Tribunal dismissed the application after finding that it was the Applicant’s steadfast refusal to sign a new extension of appointment that led to her separation from service.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Gnassou
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type