51³Ô¹Ï

Portfolio Evaluations


The Peacebuilding Fund embraces its central role in contributing to the knowledge base on what works and what doesn¡¯t when supporting conflict-affected communities. Underpinning this work is a monitoring and evaluation function that stresses learning as well as accountability.

Ensuring high-quality evaluation is a shared responsibility between the PBF and fund recipients, with responsibility for mandatory project evaluations resting with fund recipients, while evaluations of whole country portfolios are undertaken by the Peacebuilding Support Office.

?

Evaluation Framework in PBF-Eligible Countries


? Evaluability assessments Project evaluations Portfolio evaluations
Frequency First 6-9 months of implementation Mid-term and/or end of each project End of 5-year eligibility cycle
Objectives & methods
  • Programme design and M&E review for early adjustments
  • Participatory
  • PBSO-managed
  • Outcome-level assessments
  • Mixed methods
  • Recipient-managed, PBSO-supported
  • Outcome-level assessment
  • Mixed methods
  • PBSO-managed
?BURUNDI

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2014 - 2020?English

?

?COTE D'IVOIRE

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2015 - 2019??|?

?

?GUATEMALA

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2016 - 2019 English?

?

?

?LIBERIA

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2017 - English

?

?PAPUA NEW GUINEA

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2015 - 2017 English

?

?CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ??2014?- 2018/19??|?? ? ?

?

?EL SALVADOR

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2017 - 2023?Spanish

?

?GUINEA

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2017?- 2022?French

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2012 - 2016 French

?

?MADAGASCAR

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2021?English

?

?SOMALIA

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2019 - English

?

?CHAD

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2017 - 2022?French

?

?GAMBIA

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2017 - 2022?English

?

?KYRGYZSTAN

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2018 - 2020 - English

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2017 - English

?

?MALI

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2014 - 2018?|?

?